Legal Opinion
Wucherpfennig v. Dooley
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 11, 1984No. Civil 10578PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SAND, Justice.
Donald Wucherpfennig appealed from a district court judgment dismissing his claim for specific performance of an alleged contract for the sale of land. We affirm.
Donald Wucherpfennig, Elizabeth Dooley, and Louise Grettum are the children of Fred and Harriet Wucherpfennig. Fred died in 1964 and Harriet died in 1977. The family farm, consisting of four quarters of land, passed to Donald, Elizabeth, and Louise by their parents’ wills. The quarter which includes the farmstead, known as the “home quarter,” was devised as follows: two-thirds undivided interest to Donald, one-sixth…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cooke v. Blood Systems, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- Minar v. SkoogSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Greenberg v. StewartNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- Markmann v. H. A. Bruntjen Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Grossman v. McLeish RanchNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
3Cited by7 opinions
- Triton Corporation v. Hardrives, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Ehlen v. MelvinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Davis v. SatromNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Farley v. Champs Fine Foods, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Waslaski v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.