Legal Opinion

Piller v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided January 17, 1934No. Docket No. 63023Published

During the taxable period the petitioner, which kept its books and filed its tax return on the cash receipts and disbursements basis, deposited with the tax commission of New York State certain corporate bonds to secure the payment of an estimated inheritance or transfer tax imposed by the laws of that state with respect to certain contingent interests created by the will of the petitioner's testator.

Read the full summary

During the taxable period the petitioner, which kept its books and filed its tax return on the cash receipts and disbursements basis, deposited with the tax commission of New York State certain corporate bonds to secure the payment of an estimated inheritance or transfer tax imposed by the laws of that state with respect to certain contingent interests created by the will of the petitioner's testator. Held, that the deposit of the bonds did not constitute payment of the tax and that the amount thereof is not an allowable deduction in determining the petitioner's taxable net income.

1Opinion of the Court

ESTATE OF BENJAMIN PILLER, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Piller v. Commissioner

Docket No. 63023.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

29 B.T.A. 799; 1934 BTA LEXIS 1479;

January 17, 1934, Promulgated

During the taxable period the petitioner, which kept its books and filed its tax return on the cash receipts and disbursements basis, deposited with the tax commission of New York State certain corporate bonds to secure the payment of an estimated inheritance or transfer tax imposed by the laws of that state with respect to certain contingent interests created by the will…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Piller v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API