Legal Opinion

McLean v. Wohltjen

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided January 15, 1899PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Second Municipal Court, borough of Manhattan, in favor of the defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtGildersleeve, J.

The plaintiff carried on the business of selling and leasing bicycles, under the name of Durant, McLean & Co. The designation “ & Co.” did not represent any partner, as required by the statute (Laws of 1886, chap. 262, amending Laws of 1833, chap. 281). One McElvinney leased a bicycle of the plaintiff, and executed the following contract, viz.: “ This certifies that I have this day rented from Durant, McLean & Go. the following property: One Crawford bicycle, * * * to hold for a term of fifty weeks, from the date of this instrument, and. for the use and depreciation of said property I hereby…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Taylor v. Bell & Bogart Soap Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Doyle v. ShuttleworthNew York Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Black v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1911
  3. Vandegrift v. BertronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API