Sanders v. Sutlive Bros. & Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Lee District Court. — Hon. W. S. Hamilton, Judge. Action to recover possession of real property and for damages. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, the defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
Withrow, J. I.
One Lorenz Rigler died intestate October 13, 1906, owning in fee the real estate, the right to possession of which is in controversy, situated in the city of Keokuk, together with other real estate. He left surviving him his widow, Margaret Rigler, and two daughters, Neoma Weber and Sarah Speisz. October 28, 1903, the two daughters conveyed by deed to their mother for the term of her natural life all of the real estate which descended from their father, including that which is the basis of this suit; said conveyance providing that the grantee, the mother, should “have and hold…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Andrews v. Marshall Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- Sexauer v. WilsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- German State Bank v. HerronSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
- O'Brien v. Troxel & BrotherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
- Carman v. MosierSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- McCarter v. UbanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
- Haywood v. . BriggsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Sanders v. Sutlive Bros. & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1915
- Sanders v. Sutlive Bros. & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Fritch v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.