State v. Nimrod

Defendant appeals his conviction and sentence of 18 years for the crime of robbery first degree. Defendant was sentenced by the court upon the basis of its finding that the Second Offender Act applied.

The only claim of error is the defendant’s assertion that certain proof at trial constituted evidence of another crime. The defendant’s motion for new trial was not timely filed and did not preserve the error for review. Rule 27.20(a); State v. Clark, 432 S.W.2d 279 (Mo.1968); State v. Rodgers, 525 S.W.2d 447 (Mo.App.1975). The judgment and conviction are affirmed.

Defendant has not requested…