Legal Opinion

Howe v. Cronin

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 22, 1979No. 28208PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pringle

Petitioner Howe appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his writ of habeas corpus, and the order requiring his extradition to the State of North Dakota. We affirm the district court.

The petitioner claims that the extradition request issued by the Governor of North Dakota is insufficient in that it seeks to extradite him as a “fugitive from justice,” pursuant to section 16-19-103, C.R.S. 1973, when in fact he could only be extradited as a nonfugitive, pursuant to section 16-19-107, C.R.S. 1973.

We find the petitioner’s argument to be without merit. As was stated recently by the United…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Michigan v. DoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Norrod v. BowerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  3. Teters v. WatsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dietz v. LeachSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  2. Miller v. DebekkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  3. Johnson v. CroninSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API