Legal Opinion

United States v. Alberto Ruiz-Alonso, AKA Alberto Torrez-Ugaldo, AKA Alberto Torrez-Ugalde

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 11, 2005No. 03-50125PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRABER, Circuit Judge.

In this illegal reentry case, the United States appeals the district court’s decision at sentencing to depart downward by four levels. Defendant Alberto Ruiz-Alonso seeks to dismiss the appeal because of the government’s alleged failure to demonstrate that it had “the personal approval of the Attorney General, the Solicitor General, or a deputy solicitor general designated by the Solicitor General” to proceed with this appeal, as required by 18 U.S.C. § 3742(b).

Joining our sister circuits, we hold that 18 U.S.C. § 3742(b) does not impose a jurisdictional requirement. See…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Kontrick v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Glidden Co. v. ZdanokSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Scarborough v. PrincipiSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Roell v. WithrowSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. Sierra-CastilloCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. Clifford A. Davis, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. SerrataCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. Heon Seok LeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  5. United States v. Clifford A. Davis, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API