Hooks v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Cherry, J.:
This appeal presents the issue of whether appellant Jerry Hooks knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his right to counsel when he exercised his right to represent himself at trial. Because the district court did not adequately canvass Hooks regarding his waiver, pursuant to Faretta v. California,1 and the record as a whole does not sufficiently establish a valid waiver, we reverse the judgment of conviction. In doing so, we clarify that a Faretta canvass conducted in justice court before a preliminary hearing will rarely be sufficient, standing…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Chapman v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Lowe v. Washoe CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Je Dunn Northwest, Inc. v. Corus Const. VentureNevada Supreme Court · 2011
- Woods (Leonard) Vs. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2020
- Landreth v. MalikNevada Supreme Court · 2009
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.