Legal Opinion

In re Grammel's Estate

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1899PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Ingham; Wisner, J., presiding. The probate court of Ingham county disallowed certain items in the final account of Frederick Schneider, as guardian of Rudolph and Louise J. Grammel, minor heirs of George Grammel, deceased, and the guardian appealed to the circuit court, where the order settling the account was set aside. Rudolph and Louise J. Grammel bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

On July 25, 1892, George Grammel died intestate, leaving a widow and five children, of whom the appellants were two. Prior to October, 1892, the appellee was appointed guardian for them; and among other property was two-thirds of the proceeds of a life-insurance, policy for $5,000. It was received about October 7, 1892. He deposited this sum in the Central Michigan Savings Bank, a banking institution organized under the law of this State, and took a certificate bearing interest at 4 per cent., upon the condition that the deposit be continued three months or more. The bank failed and closed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. HuntMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  2. Woodruff v. SnedecorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re Culhane's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Walker v. BuhlMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Gross v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  4. Newton v. Old-Merchants National Bank & Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941
  5. In re BristolMichigan Supreme Court · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API