Plummer v. United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PRETTYMAN, Circuit Judge.
Appellant was indicted jointly with one Harry S. Kopel in three counts, (1) for setting up and keeping “a certain gaming table for the purpose of gaming”; (2) for setting up and keeping “a certain place for-the purpose of gaming”; and (3) for unlawfully betting and gambling and wager-, i'ng money upon the result of a horse race. 1 Koocl was acquitted on all counts. Appellant was acquitted by direction of the-court on the second count. He was convicted by the jury on the first and third counts. On this appeal he contests the. validity of his conviction on the first…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Beard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
- Foster D. Snell, Inc. v. PottersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- Forte v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
- Washington Coin MacH. Ass'n v. CallahanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
- Cooper v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1948
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Julius Silverman v. United States of America, Meyer Schwartz v. United States of America, Robert L. Martin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- Julius Silverman v. United States of America, Meyer Schwartz v. United States of America, Robert L. Martin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- Pepe v. AndersonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1962