Legal Opinion
Chun Shee v. Nagle
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 23, 1925No. 4636PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCAMANT, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
It is contended that there was an insufficient showing of facts to justify the arrest of appellant. It is not necessary to notice this contention, because it is well settled that irregularities in the arrest of an alien will not justify his discharge, if it appears on a fair hearing that ho is subject to deportation. U. S. v. Williams, 200 F. 538, 541, 118 C. C. A. 632; U. S. v. Uhl, 211 F. 628, 633, 128 C. C. A. 560; Healy v. Backus, 221 F. 358, 361, 137 C. C. A. 166.
It is contended that appellant’s hearing was unfair. This contention is based on the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fok Yung Yo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- United States ex rel. Rosen v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912
- United States ex rel. Bauder v. UhlCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
- Healy v. BackusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wolck v. WeedinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
- Seif v. NagleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
- Emeterio Cuesta, Also Known as Emeterio Cuesta Campillo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- Haff v. Tom Tang SheeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
- Kostenowczyk v. NagleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.