Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sawyer v. Frank

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 10, 1911Published

Appeal from Woodbury District Court. — Hon. Frank E. Gaynor, Judge. In an action to enjoin the maintenance by defendant Frank .of a liquor nuisance on premises belonging to defendant Bichardson, with the knowledge of the latter, there was a decree for defendants, and from this decree the plaintiff appeals.

1DissentDeemer, J.

(dissenting). — The filing of this supplemental opinion gives me an opportunity not otherwise available of citing authorities in support of my original dissent, which were not at hand when the opinion was filed. They are as follows: Roberson v. State, 100 Ala. 37 (14 South. 554) ; Whitmore v. State, 72 Ark. 14 (77 S. W. 598); Davis v. State, 53 Tex. Cr. R. 373 (109 S. W. 938) ; Hood v. State, 35 Tex. Cr. R. 585 (34 S. W. 935) ; Wright v. State, 35 Tex. Cr. R. 581 (34 S. W. 935, 936); Brignon v. State, 37 Tex. Cr. R. 71 (38 S. W. 786) ; Treue v. State (Tex. Cr. App.), 44 S. W. 829; Skidmore v.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Whitmore v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1903
  2. Hood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  3. Roberson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  4. Wright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  5. Brignon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API