State ex rel. City of Minneapolis v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Lees, C.
The parties to this appeal will be thus designated in this opinion: The relator as the “city”; the Minneapolis Street Railway Company as the “street railway company”; the Twin City Rapid Transit Company as the “transit company”; and the other appellants as “individual appellants.” The Minnesota Railroad and Warehouse Commission will be designated as the “commission.”
On June 21, 1921, pursuant to chapter 278, p. 328, Laws 1921, the street railway company applied to the commission to have its property valued and its rates of fare fixed so as to yield a reasonable return, on the fair…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Adams Express Co. v. Ohio State AuditorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Smith v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Campbell v. Motion Picture Machine OperatorsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. FleischmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Peterson v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- United States v. FleischmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950