Legal Opinion

Meil v. Syracuse Constructors, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 23, 1963PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The Trial Justice dismissed these negligence actions as to both defendants at the conclusion of all of the testimony thus deciding that the plaintiffs had failed to make out a cause of action against either defendant as a matter of law. *12It is therefore necessary to consider the facts which the jury might have found in favor of plaintiffs, giving plaintiffs not only the benefit of these facts but also of all reasonable inferences which could properly have been drawn therefrom. We shall relate only the facts as they were beneficial to plaintiffs.

On a dark, rainy night the plaintiffs were in an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Beck v. . CarterNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Klepper v. Seymour House Corp. of Ogdensburg, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
  3. Murphy v. . City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Bennett v. City of Mount VernonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  5. Ellis v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mora v. StateIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Smart v. WozniakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  3. Woodcock v. County of NiagaraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  4. Cole v. Triple M Excavating & Trucking LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API