Legal Opinion · Dissent

Perdue v. State Nat. Bank

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 30, 1950No. 6 Div. 891Published

1DissentBrown, Justice

Before § 10390 of the Code of 1923 was embodied in Equity Rule 36, Code 1940, Tit. 7 Appendix, it had been consistently construed as not changing the fundamental principles of equity upon which bills of interpleader or bill in the nature of inter-pleader rests. That such principles have not been modified by the statute see Marcus et al. v. Peoples Sav. Bank et al., 227 Ala. 576, 151 So. 467; Finn v. Missouri State Life Ins. Co., 222 Ala. 413, 132 So. 632; Riddick v. American Employers Ins. Co., 236 Ala. 323, 182 So. 45; Michie et al. v. Nebrig et al., 223 Ala. 175, 134 So. 665; Harden v.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Finn v. Missouri State Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  2. Missouri State Life Ins. Co. v. Robertson Banking Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  3. Johnson v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  4. City of Enterprise v. FlemingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  5. Modern Order of Praeligtorians v. MerrimanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API