Perdue v. State Nat. Bank
Supreme Court of Alabama
1DissentBrown, Justice
Before § 10390 of the Code of 1923 was embodied in Equity Rule 36, Code 1940, Tit. 7 Appendix, it had been consistently construed as not changing the fundamental principles of equity upon which bills of interpleader or bill in the nature of inter-pleader rests. That such principles have not been modified by the statute see Marcus et al. v. Peoples Sav. Bank et al., 227 Ala. 576, 151 So. 467; Finn v. Missouri State Life Ins. Co., 222 Ala. 413, 132 So. 632; Riddick v. American Employers Ins. Co., 236 Ala. 323, 182 So. 45; Michie et al. v. Nebrig et al., 223 Ala. 175, 134 So. 665; Harden v.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Finn v. Missouri State Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Missouri State Life Ins. Co. v. Robertson Banking Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Johnson v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
- City of Enterprise v. FlemingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- Modern Order of Praeligtorians v. MerrimanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.