Legal Opinion
Black v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided July 12, 1949No. Claim No. 28481; Claim No. 28509PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRyan, J.
The claimants Black seek to recover from the State of New York the sum of $228.80, and the claimant Harvey seeks to recover the sum of $160.50, the amounts of damages respectively sustained when their camp properties at Polar Beach were flooded by waters of Oneida Lake in the months of April to June, 1947. The injury was caused by Caughdenoy Dam. The State of New York has responded in damages many times to many owners of property bordering on the lake for the negligent construction and maintenance of this dam. Its liability has been established. We need cite only Haskell v. State of New *485York…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Reich v. . CochranNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Lewis v. . New York Harlem R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Crouse v. . McVickarNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Wilson v. . City of TroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Prentice v. . GeigerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Town of Vienna v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1953
- Black v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1950
- Harvey v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1950