Legal Opinion

Begian v. Sarajian (In re Begian)

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided December 20, 2018No. B278316PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtEgerton, J.

*508INTRODUCTION

*694Family Code section 852, subdivision (a)1 ( section 852(a) ) provides that a "transmutation," or an interspousal transaction changing the character of community or separate property, "is not valid unless made in writing by an *509express declaration " by the adversely affected spouse. (Italics added.) In Estate of MacDonald (1990) 51 Cal.3d 262, 272 Cal.Rptr. 153, 794 P.2d 911 ( MacDonald ), our Supreme Court held that a writing satisfies the "express declaration" requirement only if it states on its face that "the characterization or ownership of the property is being changed." ( Id.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Estate of RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Hembree v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Estate of MacDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. In Re Marriage of BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Estate of BibbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Estate of Lu CA1/4California Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API