Legal Opinion

Hakas v. Bergenthal

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1992No. S-3708, S-4276PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.

When this matter was last before this court we concluded that:

Given Hakas’ concessions that she was a resident of Alaska on August 19, 1987 when Bergenthal filed his petition for custody of Jarle, we have determined that the Memorandum Opinion and Judgment issued in this case on June 27, 1990 must be vacated and withdrawn. We now retain jurisdiction for purposes of deciding Hakas’ second specification of error in her original appeal, namely, whether the superior court erred in awarding custody of Jarle to Bergenthal as a sanction without considering the best…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nichols v. MandelinAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Everett v. EverettSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
  3. Lee v. CoxAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
  4. In Re the Marriage of McGeeColorado Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Joseph E. H. v. Jane E. H.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bird v. StarkeyAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Crane v. CraneAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Kelly v. JosephAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Elliott v. SettjeAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Platz v. AramburoAlaska Supreme Court · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API