Legal Opinion

Fallis v. City of North Miami

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 15, 1961No. 30786PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THORNAL, Justice.

Appellants, Fallís and Wineberg, as taxpayers, seek reversal of a decree validating an issue of refunding and improvement revenue certificates.

We must decide whether the appellee city met the requirements of its charter and other applicable statutes in the proceedings by which it authorized the issuance of the certificates.

By ordinance, the City of North Miami authorized the issuance of so-called “refunding and improvement revenue certificates” in the amount of $400,000. The proceeds of the sale of the certificates are to be used to refund previously issued revenue…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Welker v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  2. State v. City of North MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  3. City of Lake Worth v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  4. State v. City of North MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  5. State v. Town of De Funiak SpringsSupreme Court of Florida · 1956

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance Company v. Orthopedic Specialists, etc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2017
  2. Birnholz v. 44 Wall Street Fund, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  3. Birnholz v. 44 Wall Street Fund, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  4. Allstate Insurance Company v. Orthopedic Specialists, etc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2017
  5. Orthopedic Specialists, as Assignee of Kelli Serridge v. Allstate Insurance CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API