Legal Opinion

Rooney v. Rice

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1939No. File No. 8269PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

The question to be decided is whether an incumbent superintendent of schools, who' charges that the one declared elected to hold the office for the ensuing term violated some of the provisions of sections 7371-7384, inclusive, Rev. 'Code of 1919, as amended by Chapters 220 and 221 of the Session Laws of 1921, commonly known as the Corrupt Practices Act, may, on his own motion, file a contest under the provisions of sections 7336 to 7347, inclusive, Rev. Code of 1919, without complying with the provisions of section 7338, supra, requiring the approval of the state’s attorney or allowance by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Batterton v. FullerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Kundert v. City of MadisonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Bronson v. City of Rapid CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fraase v. MurrayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API