Legal Opinion

In Re Conrad

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided June 3, 1992No. Bankruptcy 87-30089 SPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER RE MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION •

MARY D. SCOTT, Bankruptcy Judge.

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Motion for Clarification filed by the debtors. The dispute between the debtors and the Federal Land Bank centers around the proper application of payments received by the Federal Land Bank from the trustee. Federal Land Bank contends that it is entitled to post-petition interest, costs and attorneys’ fees under 11 U.S.C. § 506(b). The debtors contend that the confirmed plan does not provide for post-petition interest, costs, and attorneys’ fees such that the Federal Land Bank may not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The Boston Five Cents Savings Bank v. Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  2. In Re FawcettCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  3. Fawcett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Jack Kline Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
  2. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. v. Blair (In Re Blair)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API