Legal Opinion

Rudnick v. Bentler

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 22, 1961PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

66 N.J. Super. 224 (1961)

168 A.2d 813

SARAH RUDNICK, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

FRED BENTLER AND KENNETH MILSON, DEFENDANTS.

UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND BOARD OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued March 6, 1961.

Decided March 22, 1961.

Before Judges CONFORD, FREUND and KILKENNY.

Mr. Donald R. Sorkow argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Sorkow and Sorkow, attorneys).

Mrs. Annamay T. Sheppard argued the cause for respondent (Mr. William O. Barnes, Jr., attorney; Mr. Barnes on the brief).

The opinion of the court was delivered by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Betz v. Director of Division of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Boyd v. MariniNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  2. Quinchia v. WaddingtonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
  3. Feliciano v. OglesbyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  4. Kiczales v. StreleckiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  5. Melvin v. RembertDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API