Legal Opinion

Euliss v. . McAdams

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1888PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The petition was filed under sec. 1926 of The Code, and, after setting out the boundaries of the land of the petitioner, alleges: "That some of the dividing lines between Joseph McAdams and your petitioner, to wit: From a stone and pointers, his (McAdams) corner, (392) N. 8 chains to a stake; thence W. 24 chains to pointers; thence S. 9.50 chains to the beginning, are in dispute," and asks for an order directing the processioning of his land.

Thereupon (a summons having been duly issued and served upon the defendants) an order was issued to the county surveyor, ex officio processioner,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Forney v. . WilliamsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  2. Porter v. . DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  3. Roberts v. . DickeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pruden v. KeemerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. Tindall v. WillisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API