Euliss v. . McAdams
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
The petition was filed under sec. 1926 of The Code, and, after setting out the boundaries of the land of the petitioner, alleges: "That some of the dividing lines between Joseph McAdams and your petitioner, to wit: From a stone and pointers, his (McAdams) corner, (392) N. 8 chains to a stake; thence W. 24 chains to pointers; thence S. 9.50 chains to the beginning, are in dispute," and asks for an order directing the processioning of his land.
Thereupon (a summons having been duly issued and served upon the defendants) an order was issued to the county surveyor, ex officio processioner,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Forney v. . WilliamsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
- Porter v. . DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
- Roberts v. . DickeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pruden v. KeemerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Tindall v. WillisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989