Cunningham v. Rodgers
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF ' COLUMBIA. Error to a judgment of the court below affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court of the District of Cqlumbia sústaining a demurrer to the declaration in an action for debt and dismissing the action.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds
Section 1697, Revised Statutes, as amended by Act of December *21,1898, c. 36, 30 S'tat. 77Ó, requires every Consul-General before receiving his commission to execute a bond conditioned for the true and faithful performance of duties lawfully imposed upon him as. such officer., It is copied in the margin.
Purporting to proceed under this section plaintiff in error brought an action in the Supreme Court, District of Columbia, against >. James Linn Rodgers, once Consul- General at Shanghai, China, , and the sureties upon his official bond. Process was served upon him but the sureties were not…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Mead v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
- United States ex rel. Parravicino v. BrunswickCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1934
- In Re TyreeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Johnson v. MartinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- United States for Use of Garcia v. McAninchDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.