Legal Opinion

In re Wright

Superior Court of Buffalo

Decided December 30, 1891PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from municipal court. Summary proceedings by William F. Wright to remove I. H., Radford from certain premises. From the order of the municipal court awarding possession to plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHatch, J.

In this proceeding a precept was issued upon a regularly verified petition alleging the expiration of the term, and was’served upon Anna Rad-ford, she being a person residing upon, and in the occupation of, the premises at the time of such service. Upon the return of the precept the tenant appeared before the judge by attorney, and tendered an answer, Verified by the said Anna Radford, which recited, among other things, that she was the person in possession of the premises, and for her answer to the petition she denied each and every allegation contained therein, except as admitted. It then…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brown v. . VolkeningNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. The People Ex Rel. Ainslee v. . HowlettNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  3. People ex rel. Hoffman v. ColesNew York Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Provost v. DonohueNew York Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rochdale Village, Inc. v. GoodeAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2007
  2. Barney v. DuVivierAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1914
  3. Earle v. McGoldrickNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895
  4. Full Value Realty Co. v. StoneAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API