J.S. v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
This is an appeal by the respondents J.S. and B.S.B. from adverse findings of delinquency for the offense of dealing in stolen property, to wit: a boat, and an order of disposition entered after a non-jury trial. We affirm.
First, we conclude that the trial court did not commit reversible error, as urged, in allowing the state to question its witness Keith Hill based on a written statement which was given by the witness to the police. Although arguably under the then-effective statute,1 the state could not, as a general rule, conduct such questioning from the subject statement because the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
- J.S.H. v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Austin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- In Interest of FRDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Brumbley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- J.S. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- JS v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998