Legal Opinion

J.S. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 7, 1991No. Nos. 89-382, 89-383PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal by the respondents J.S. and B.S.B. from adverse findings of delinquency for the offense of dealing in stolen property, to wit: a boat, and an order of disposition entered after a non-jury trial. We affirm.

First, we conclude that the trial court did not commit reversible error, as urged, in allowing the state to question its witness Keith Hill based on a written statement which was given by the witness to the police. Although arguably under the then-effective statute,1 the state could not, as a general rule, conduct such questioning from the subject statement because the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  2. J.S.H. v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  3. Austin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  4. In Interest of FRDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  5. Brumbley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. J.S. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  2. JS v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API