Legal Opinion

King Kup-Schoener Candies, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 29, 1973No. Appeal, No. 302 C.D. 1973PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion bt

Judge Wilkinson,

Two issues are presented for decision in this appeal from the order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board. -The first relates only to the facts of the instant case — does the record support the findings? The second is of wider import — can a successor-referee who has not heard the testimony or seen the witnesses make findings based on the record prepared by his predecessor-referee?

Claimant-appellee, identified by employer-appellant as a candy packer, suffered a compensable injury to her left hand and wrist on July 15, 1969, while dumping candy from a tray. Under…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Universal Cyclops Steel Corp. v. KrawczynskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Sherred v. PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Wilder v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Duquesne Brewing Co. v. DydaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rockwood Area School District v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Biagini v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Biagini v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API