King Kup-Schoener Candies, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion bt
Judge Wilkinson,
Two issues are presented for decision in this appeal from the order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board. -The first relates only to the facts of the instant case — does the record support the findings? The second is of wider import — can a successor-referee who has not heard the testimony or seen the witnesses make findings based on the record prepared by his predecessor-referee?
Claimant-appellee, identified by employer-appellant as a candy packer, suffered a compensable injury to her left hand and wrist on July 15, 1969, while dumping candy from a tray. Under…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Universal Cyclops Steel Corp. v. KrawczynskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Sherred v. PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Wilder v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Duquesne Brewing Co. v. DydaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rockwood Area School District v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Biagini v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Biagini v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993