Legal Opinion

Beth Abraham Hospital v. Bowen

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 28, 1988No. 86 Civ. 8240 (RWS)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Plaintiff Beth Abraham Hospital (“Beth Abraham”) has moved for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P, in its action seeking review of a decision of the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (the “Secretary”) that adopted the decision of the Provider Reimbursement Review Board (“PRRB”) denying Beth Abraham reimbursement for certain costs it incurred in its 1980-82 cost years. The Secretary has cross-moved for judgment on the pleadings. For the reasons set forth below, the case is remanded to the Secretary for further proceedings…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. DNA Plant Technology Corp. v. Navigators InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API