Legal Opinion · Dissent

Royce Haulage Corp. v. Bronx Terminal Garage, Inc.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided September 14, 1945Published

1Dissent

Shiehtag, J. (dissenting).

I dissent. While the trial court may have been justified in setting the verdict aside as against the weight of the evidence, it was without power, under the authorities, to direct a verdict against the tenant (Blum v. Fresh Grown Preserve Corp., 292 N. Y. 241; Ruthizer v. Bass Dress Corp., 264 App. Div. 372, 373). The testimony of the tenant, if believed by the triers of the facts (and the jury did find in favor of the tenant) was sufficient to establish a tenancy “ until the end of the war.” That testimony, although open to suspicion, was not “ incredible as matter…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Blum v. Fresh Grown Preserve Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
  2. Ruthizer v. William Bass Dress Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API