Matter of Scranton v. Supreme Court of the State of New York
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. The judgments of the Appellate Division should be affirmed,, without costs. A claim of a denial of a speedy trial is not cognizable in an application pursuant to CPLB article 78 for a judgment prohibiting a District Attorney and the Justices of the Supreme Court from proceeding on an indictment. (Matter of Watts v. Supreme Ct. of State of N. Y., 28 N Y 2d 714; Matter of Lee v. County Ct. of Erie County, 27 N Y 2d 432, 437; Matter of Blake v. Hogan, 25 N Y 2d 747.) While a double jeopardy claim may be raised in a prohibition proceeding (Matter of State of New York v. King, 36 N Y…
2Cited by8 opinions
- United States of America Ex Rel. Agnes Scranton v. The State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Root v. KapelmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Rafferty v. OwensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Matter of Lopez v. Justices of the Supreme Court of New York CountyNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Valenti v. MarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.