Legal Opinion

Town of Silverthorne v. Lutz

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided February 11, 2016No. Court of Appeals No. 14CA1505PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

JUDGE MILLER

- (1 In this eminent domain action, respondents, Matthew F. Lutz and Edward R. Lutz (landowners), appeal the judgment in favor of petitioner Town of Silverthorne, a home rule municipality. The landowners contend that the trial court erred by excluding evidence of the Town's Great Outdoors Colorado Program (GOCO) funds from the immediate possession hearing, They argue that this evidence was relevant to thé Town's authority to condemn the land because 'the GOCO amendment, article XXVII, section 9 of the Colorado Constitution, bars a GOCO fund recipient from using its funds…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Bly v. StorySupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
  2. Huber v. COLORADO MINING ASS'NSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  3. Colorado Ethics Watch v. Senate Majority Fund, LLCSupreme Court of Colorado · 2012
  4. City of Thornton v. Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  5. Potashnik v. Public Service Co. of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Carousel Farms Metro. Dist. v. Woodcrest Homes, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API