Legal Opinion
United States v. Allick
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 7, 2010No. Nos. 08-4165, 08-4254, 08-4255, 08-4299, 08-4300PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHAGARES, Circuit Judge.
Appellants Shango Allick, Marcelino Garcia, Carolyn Urgent, Isaiah Fawkes, and Christopher Alfred challenge the District Court’s denial of their motions to dismiss the indictments against them based on double jeopardy. On April 15, 2008, another panel of this Court vacated an earlier order of the District Court denying the appellants’ motions to dismiss, remanding the case for an evidentiary hearing to address gaps in the record that precluded us from determining whether double jeopardy barred reprosecution. United States v. Allick, 274 Fed.Appx. 128 (3d…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Najawicz v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2013
- United States v. Isaiah FawkesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- SINGER v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
- Stanford Williams v. Eric Armel, Superintendent of SCI-Fayette, District Attorney of Allegheny County, and The Attorney General of the Commonwealth of PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
- Urgent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011