Legal Opinion

Camel City Coach Co. v. Griffin

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 23, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoNNob, J.

There has been no final judgment determining the rights o£ the parties upon the matters involved in the controversy out of which this action arises. Issues of fact arising upon the pleadings have not been tried. A temporary restraining order, in accordance with the motion of plaintiff, supported by affidavits, has been continued to the final hearing by an order of the county court. The action has been heard in this Court upon defendant’s appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court, affirming the order of the county court. Defendant excepted to the judgment and assigns same as error.

Plaintiff…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cobb v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Scott v. . GillisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  2. Rutledge v. . FitzgeraldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API