Legal Opinion

In re Selly

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1942PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNull, J.

Arbitration is opposed on the ground that the contract between the parties has been terminated by virtue of an order *1077made by the Defense Communications Board of the United States which directed the closing of the respondent’s stations, offices and facilities. The respondent has not been dissolved and has a legal existence.

The controversy which the petitioner seeks to have arbitrated does not involve the continuance in the respondent’s employ of former employees nor the enforcement of any other provision of the contract between the parties which has been rendered lawfully or otherwise…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between Potoker & Brooklyn Eagle, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. In re the Arbitration between Potoker & Brooklyn Eagle, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
  3. In re the Arbitration between Simplex Machine Tool Corp. & Swind Machinery Co.New York Supreme Court · 1955
  4. In re the Arbitration between Grinnell Corp. & American District Telegraph Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API