Legal Opinion
Watson v. Atlanta Joint Stock Land Bank
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided June 17, 1937No. 26193PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.
The Atlanta Joint Stock Land Bank brought suit against Hubert Watson, alleging that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff on a note which is attached to and made a part of the petition; that ten days before filing suit the defendant was served with notice of the intention to bring suit and to claim attorney’s fees (the note calling for ten per cent, attorney’s fees); and that defendant fails and refuses to pay the indebtedness. The note shows that it was given for the rental of farm lands for the *11year 1933, and embodied therein is the following: “This note is taken subject to bank’s…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Prior v. Hilton & Dodge Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Perry v. PaschalSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Sheffield v. WhitfieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Pape v. Woolford Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
- Aspironal Laboratories Inc. v. RosenblattCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Benefield v. MaloneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Cooper v. G. E. Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Cooper v. G. E. Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Watson v. Atlanta Joint Stock Land BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938