Legal Opinion

Haynes v. Bramlett

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1901Published

Motion to strike portions of transcript and to quash or dismiss the writ of error.

1Per curiam

This cause came on for hearing upon motion of de*142fenclant in error to strike from the transcript of the record certain designated portions thereof and certain assignments of error and to quash or dismiss the writ of error dr affirm the judgment of the court below upon grounds stated in said motion; upon consideration thereof and the briefs filed by the parties, it is ordered and adjudged by the court that the following portions of the transcript so moved to be stricken, to-wit: Affidavit of T. W. Bramlett, on pages 5 and 6, affidavit of W. B. Haynes on page 11, affidavit of Thomas E. Bugg, on…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hellen & Acosta v. Steinwender & SellnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API