Legal Opinion

Arruda v. Arruda

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1927No. 1754PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

On April 1, 1927, the time for filing the record in this case in support of the appeal was duly extended to and including the 11th day of April, 1927. No part of the record on appeal was filed in this court either within the twenty days allowed by the rule or within the further time granted. On April 12, 1927, the appellant filed a motion that he be given further time within which to prepare and file the record and in support of the motion presented an affidavit of the stenographer who reported the cause to the effect that he would be unable to complete the preparation of the transcript of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Keahilihau v. KingHawaii Supreme Court · 1919
  2. In re the Estate of BrownHawaii Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Kiyono Iwamoto v. MedeirosHawaii Supreme Court · 1922
  4. de Coito v. de CoitoHawaii Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of NukushinaHawaii Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Orth v. BaskerHawaii Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API