Legal Opinion

Pritzker v. Stern

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 9, 1947No. [No. 46, October Term, 1946]PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarkell, J.

On May 20, 1946, Samuel J. Topaz filed a bill against appellant and Samuel Horwitz, alleging inter alia that: Since 1923 plaintiff and defendants have been partners with equal interests, in the cleaning and dyeing business, trading under the name Eagle Dry Cleaning & Dyeing Works; irreconcilable differences have arisen between plaintiff and defendants so as to make the continuation of the parenership absolutely impossible; the parties are the owners of the leasehold property 2656-2658 Pennsylvania Avenue, where the business is conducted, and also have machinery, fixtures, equipment, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. DorseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1848
  2. Bortner v. LeibCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1924
  3. Wilmer v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1891
  4. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1891
  5. Burnham v. BurnhamCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Basile Baumann Prost Cole & Assocs., Inc. v. BBP & Assocs. LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
  2. McNulty v. HeineDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1956
  3. Tilghman v. FrazerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1952
  4. Blondell v. OremCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1952
  5. Della Ratta v. DyasCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API