State Ex Rel. King v. Lothrop
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
County commissioners can only exercise such powers as are specially granted, or as may be necessarily incidental for the purpose of carrying such powers into effect; and when the law prescribes the mode which they must pursue in the exercise of these powers, it excludes all other modes of procedure. Waite v. Ormsby Co., 1 Nev. 370; State v. Washoe Co., 6 Nev. 104; State v. Central Pac. Ry., 9 Nev. 79; Sadler v. Eureka Co., 15 Nev. 39; Godchaux v. Carpenter, 19 Nev. 415, 14 P. 140; State v. Washoe Co., 22 Nev. 15, 34 P. 1057; Lyon Co. v. Ross, 24 Nev. 102,50 P. 1.
A search of the statutory…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State ex rel. Hess v. County CommissionersNevada Supreme Court · 1870
- Sadler v. Board of County CommissionersNevada Supreme Court · 1880
- State v. Central Pacific RailroadNevada Supreme Court · 1873
- Waitz v. Ormsby CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1865
- Godchaux v. CarpenterNevada Supreme Court · 1887
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Board of Com'rs of Guadalupe County v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1939
- Bryant v. Board of ExaminersMontana Supreme Court · 1956
- Board of Com'rs of Guadalupe County v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1939
- Bryant v. Board of ExaminersMontana Supreme Court · 1956
- State Ex Rel. Morgan v. State Board of ExaminersMontana Supreme Court · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.