Austrian v. Williams
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
COXE, District Judge.
These are motions by the defendants, pursuant to Rules 12(b) (6) and 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U. S.C.A., for an order dismissing the amended complaint and granting summary judgment in their favor on the ground of failure to state facts on which relief may be granted and because all of the claims asserted in the complaint are barred by the applicable New York Statute of Limitations.
Central States Electric Corporation (hereafter referred to as “debtor”), an investment company, is a Virginia Corporation which had its principal office in Richmond,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Bailey v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Russell v. ToddSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Williams v. AustrianSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Michelsen v. PenneyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Austrian v. WilliamsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- Taxin v. Food Fair Stores, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
- Wells v. PlaceDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1950
- Wells v. PlaceDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1950
- Dabney v. LevyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.