State v. Harrell
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HUSKINS, Justice.
We have decided to consider the appeal on its merits. Hence the State’s motion to dismiss the appeal is denied.
Defendant first contends that he was denied a speedy trial in the Superior Court of Craven County and that his motion to dismiss these actions on that ground should have been allowed.
The record is not clear with respect to events occurring between 24 September 1968 when defendant appealed from the recorder’s court and June 1971 when he was tried de novo in the Superior Court of Craven County. In September 1968 de*114fendant was apparently serving a prison term for some…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. EwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Smith v. HooeySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Dickey v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. EdenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. DietzSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. FrankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.