Legal Opinion

State v. Lashwood

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1986No. 14812PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORGAN, Justice.

Defendant Sheryl Lashwood (Lashwood) appeals from a judgment and conviction on three counts of forgery, SDCL 22-39-36. We affirm the conviction.

The judgment of conviction arose when Lashwood entered pleas of nolo contendere to two counts of forgery and a plea of guilty to a third count of forgery, all pursuant to a plea bargain with the State. On appeal, she now raises due process questions regarding the acceptance of the pleas on three grounds: (1) That said pleas were not knowingly, voluntarily or intelligently made; (2) that the trial court failed to ascertain that there…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Spirit Track v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Clark v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. SuttonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Butler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Hopfinger v. LeapleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. GoodwinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. SchulzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. AppleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API