State v. Lashwood
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MORGAN, Justice.
Defendant Sheryl Lashwood (Lashwood) appeals from a judgment and conviction on three counts of forgery, SDCL 22-39-36. We affirm the conviction.
The judgment of conviction arose when Lashwood entered pleas of nolo contendere to two counts of forgery and a plea of guilty to a third count of forgery, all pursuant to a plea bargain with the State. On appeal, she now raises due process questions regarding the acceptance of the pleas on three grounds: (1) That said pleas were not knowingly, voluntarily or intelligently made; (2) that the trial court failed to ascertain that there…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Spirit Track v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Clark v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. SuttonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Butler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- Hopfinger v. LeapleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. GoodwinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. SchulzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. AppleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.