Gay v. Ardry
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Eastern Dist. API*£3AX. PROM TIIE COURT OP TIIE POURTII JUDICIAL DISTRICT, POR TIIE PARISH OF TOINTE COUPEE, THE JUDGE 'OF THE SECOND PRESIDING. This is an action against the maker of a promissory note. There was a verdict for the sum claimed with legal interest from judicial demand. The verdict was found the 24th May, and judgment rendered thereon the 13th June following.
Read the full summary
Eastern Dist. API*£3AX. PROM TIIE COURT OP TIIE POURTII JUDICIAL DISTRICT, POR TIIE PARISH OF TOINTE COUPEE, THE JUDGE 'OF THE SECOND PRESIDING. This is an action against the maker of a promissory note. There was a verdict for the sum claimed with legal interest from judicial demand. The verdict was found the 24th May, and judgment rendered thereon the 13th June following. The defendant appealed, and assigned the points on which he relied as stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBullard, J.
The appellant relies upon the following points :
1st. That the court erred in ruling that the defendant had waived his exception, by not requiring a trial on it, before the case was set down for trial.
2d. That the court erred in not permitting him to interro--gate a juror, on oath, whether he understood the English language.
3d. That the verdict is void, because it does not specify the day from which the interest is to be computed.
4th. That the judgment was not rendered within the three days after the verdict, as required by the Code.
The party who fails to offer evidence of thefacts on which…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Fowler v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1842
- Powe v. Morgan's La. & Tex. R. R. & S. S. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
- State v. PushSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1871
- Barrett v. DonovanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1865
- Locke v. Mackinson & MurphySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1859