Application of Arne v. Larson, Leveret C. Russler and Waldemar J. Meldahl
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ALMOND, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming a rejection of claim 12, and the examiner’s refusal to allow claims 15 and 16, which were substituted for finally rejected claims 1 and 6. Eight claims were allowed.
Appellants’ application 1 relates to a mobile fluid carrier unit and a vehicle assembly thereof.
Claims 12 and 15 are illustrative:
“12. In a vehicle, a wheel hub having annular rim flanges, each flange having an annular clamping seat, a flexible-walled casing having beads engaged with the respective seats, clamping means fastened to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Application of Annette E. FridolphCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
- In re MasonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- In re ListenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re Charles P. Morris, Kenneth L. Pottebaum, and John D. StricklinCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Indecor, Inc. v. Fox-Wells & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Application of Roy W. DikeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
- Mooney v. Brunswick Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1980
- Application of Tomoyuki KohnoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.