Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hendrix v. Hunter

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 17, 1959No. 37615Published

1DissentFelton, Chief Judge

I dissent from the judgment of reversal and from all of the rulings of the majority except the ruling in division 1 of the opinion.

The contract between the mother and the adopting parents is void as being against public policy. I do not agree that the contract was made by the mother primarily for the benefit of the child. I think the exact opposite is true and to me it is too obvious to require debate. The consideration in Savannah Bank & Trust Co. v. Hanley, 208 Ga. 34 (65 S. E. 2d 26) flowed to the mother. Monetary consideration to a mother, or its equivalent, which forms the basis of an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Savannah Bank & Trust Co. v. WolffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  2. Savannah Bank & Trust Co. v. HanleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  3. Allen v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  4. Keheley v. KoonceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  5. Murray v. WoodfordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API