Barron v. Lovett
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Head, Justice.
The defendant in error relied in the trial court upon the Code, § 110-511, which provides that a purchaser in good faith and for a valuable consideration shall be relieved of the lien' of any judgment against the seller after the purchaser *133has been in possession (in the case of real property) for-a period of four years. Under the agreed statement of facts, this case does not fall within the provisions of § 110-511. The claimant did not purchase the land from a defendant in execution. His claim is based on a partitioning proceeding which, it may be inferred, was a division in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Schulze v. SchulzeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
- Trice v. RoseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
- Taylor v. MorganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878
- King v. DillonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880