Legal Opinion

Corley v. Anderson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 8, 1893No. 55PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES, Chief Justice.

Plaintiffs in error, as heirs of Henry W. Karnes, brought suit to recover a tract of 480 acres, surveyed in 1856 by virtue of bounty warrant number 407, issued to Henry W. Karnes on July 2, 1838. Patent issued July 6, 1859; survey made in 1856.

Defendant pleaded not guilty; also the three, five, and ten years limitations, improvements, and vouched his warrantors, who made similar answers. Verdict and judgment were for defendant.

Conclusions of Fact. — That patent was to Henry W. Karnes, and most of plaintiffs were shown to be his heirs.

About 1840 Karnes died, and his will,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Moody v. ButlerTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Farris v. GilbertTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Finch's heirs v. EdmonsonTexas Supreme Court · 1853
  4. Neill v. CodyTexas Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Ivey v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Baumgarten v. FrostTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Degetau v. MayerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  3. Frost v. BaumgartenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API