Legal Opinion

United States v. Hearn

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 11, 2009No. 08-30369, 08-30377 and 08-30387PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYNES, Circuit Judge:

Defendants Gregory Hearn, Joel Hammond, and Cassandra Collins, subject to the right to appeal the rulings on their motions to suppress, pleaded guilty to various counts arising from their possession and distribution of methamphetamine. In this consolidated appeal, the defendants challenge their convictions, arguing that the district court erroneously denied their motions to suppress evidence seized by law enforcement during or shortly after their arrests. We affirm the district court’s judgment.

I. FACTS

A. Hearn’s arrest

In March 2007, officers of the Caddo Parish Sheriffs…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. North Carolina v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Maryland v. PringleSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. United States v. Banuelos-RomeroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  2. Brown v. SudduthCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  3. Reitz v. WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023
  4. United States v. Courtland TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
  5. United States v. Joseph AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API