People v. Catalano
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Joseph J asp an, J.
The standard characterized as that of "Justice” is also described as the "equitable, the fair, the theory consistent *437with good conscience” (Cordozo, Paradoxes of Legal Science, p 39).
In People v Jones (39 NY2d 694, 701), Chief Judge Breitel, in a dissenting opinion, wrote that: "While justice and law may not be coextensive, and indeed they are not, a divergence too great is not tolerable or acceptable under constitutional limitations based on due process of law, equal protection of the law, and cruel and unusual punishment. Margin for discrepancy there…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Trop v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Weems v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- People v. SelikoffNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. BroadieNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. CooperWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
- People v. Royster, New York County Courts1982
- People v. BedellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. DonovanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982