Legal Opinion

Conrad Baking Co. v. Kunkel

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1916Published

Action by the Conrad Baking Company against Albert Kunkel. On motion to vacate an order of attachment. Denied.

1Opinion of the CourtRodenbeck, J.

An order of attachment was obtained by the plaintiff, and subsequently the defendant became insolvent, was adjudged a bankrupt, and a trustee in bankruptcy was appointed. This is a motion by the defendant to vacate the attachment on the ground of his bankruptcy, and is opposed on the ground that the trustee, and not the bankrupt, must move to vacate the attachment. The only answer made by the defendant to this position is that section 682 of the Code of Civil Procedure authorizes the “defendant,” or a person who has acquired the lien upon, or interest in, his property after it' was attached,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCarty v. LightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  2. In re BenedictNew York Supreme Court · 1902
  3. National Bank & Loan Co. v. SpencerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API